CMST 2ZP3
Option 2: Glitching tools - AI data poisoning
Groups of 3–4 students · Research-Creation Project
Project Overview
In this project, you will critically and creatively explore AI data poisoning as a glitch art methodology. Through adversarial prompting, data poisoning (using Nightshade), and image-to-image remixing (via Pollo.ai), you will generate a series of speculative images that challenge machine perception and aesthetic logic. This process allows you to examine the ethical, technical, and artistic stakes of manipulating AI-generated media.
Artistic Production Guidelines
- As a group, you must create a cohesive series of images that reflect a shared theme, aesthetic, and conceptual direction.
- Each student is responsible for producing 3–4 final images that align with the group’s agreed-upon visual and thematic logic and saving all of the prompts used to create them.
- Your group must also decide how the images will be arranged and visually assembled as a cohesive series in the digital portfolio.
- Your arrangement strategy should enhance the impact of the series, amplifying the glitch aesthetics and critical themes you’re engaging with.
Index
Software
Project Components
1. Conduct Individual Research
Each student will choose one theme:
- Glitch Aesthetics and Machine Error as Art
- Algorithmic Bias and the Ethics of Data Corruption
- Poetics of Prompting: Language, Contradiction, and AI Interpretation
- Speculative Media and Machine Perception
Write a 300–400 word report grounded in:
- 1 academic source
- 2 public sources (e.g., article, talk, podcast, artwork)
- Connect research to identity, technology, and speculative design
2. AI Data Poisoning Workflow
Individually and collectively, create a cohesive series of images by following this structured workflow:
- Generate base images using adversarial prompting in Microsoft CoPilot and slightlyh modify them using any image editing software.
- Apply Nightshade to poison selected images, distorting or confusing their machine-learned features.
- Remix poisoned images in Pollo.ai, using mislabelled or contradictory prompts to create unexpected visual outcomes.
- Document each step in your individual Process Journal, including prompts, screenshots, and observations.
3. Assemblage and Final Image Arrangement
As a group:
- Select, sequence, and present your strongest images in a curated digital portfolio (PDF).
- Consider:
- Layout: grid, visual narrative, collage, or progression
- Supporting text: image titles, captions, or poetic fragments
- Consistent visual formatting: aspect ratio, color treatment, and tone
- The final format can include visual sequences, speculative layouts, or layered image-text compositions that amplify your artistic intent.
4. Group Self-Assessment
Complete the Self-Assessment Form as a group.
Ensure your responses are thoughtful and critically reflect on your final outcome.
Project Breakdown
| Activity |
Focus |
Points |
| Week 8 Activities |
Conduct Individual Research |
5 |
| Week 9 Activities |
Final Research Report + AI Data Poisoning Workflow |
5 |
| Week 10 Activities |
Group Brainstorming, Project Planning, and Image Testing |
5 |
| Week 11 Activities |
Complete final images |
5 |
| Week 12 |
Class showcase: work-in-progress projects |
5 |
| Final Submission |
Final project + deliverables |
13 |
| Total Points |
|
38 |